The right way = make sure daily calorie intake is roughly 300-500 below expenditure and that the reduced calories does not mean cutting out fruit, veg, lean meats and good fats. The result should be a loss of 1-2lbs a week. Any more and you need more food, any less and you need to man up and eat less. This approach worked well for me and over the last two weeks I've dropped around 3lbs.
The wrong way = get a gastrointestinal bug and lose the same as you lost in the previous two weeks in 48 hours. I'm now out of bed and the light-headedness has stopped, maybe I'll make it outside for a walk too. Don't think they'll be any 100 milers this week.
FWIW, my 2c is that the former is all you ever really need to know about dropping weight. All those multi-page articles (let alone the books with hundreds of pages) aren't really aiding your understanding of weight loss. When input < output you lose weight. It's just a case of getting the balance write. This is something which is unique to every individual and formulas for resting metabolic rate can only ever give you a ball park figure. For example, I've seen various different methods for calculating my RMR and all are off by some margin (i.e. enough to mean my 500 calories less/day is actual not a reduction at all). I'm a tall and big (for a long distance triathlete) guy and the standard calculations give me an RMR of between 2200 up to about 2800. I do not lose weight unless I work on my RMR being as low as 2000. I only know this through trial and error.
Keep a rough food diary, log you calorie needs and sit down with a calculator at the end of the day. Weigh yourself every week at the same time and you'll soon be dropping weight and gaining speed. Just don't try option two, personal experience has also taught me that that is no fun at all.
Autumn Race Highlights 2.0 - 12 December
3 years ago




